Anyone seriously interested in roulette will come one day to ask whether it is better for an emphasis on numbers that do not come out long time or, instead, on those who go out more often . If you ask a seasoned roulette player what his favorite basic techniques, you will most probably mention, among other things, because he favors one or the other of these approaches.
All roulette bets are mathematically equivalent - with the exception of one, one that covers both the 0, 00, 1, 2 and 3 on the American roulette is a bet that no one should never do because it is the only one that is statistically less advantageous than all the others, a "sucker bet" involving a statistical advantage for the casino of 7.89% - we tend to believe that it is strictly identical to using techniques that exploit long absences or high recurrence of certain numbers. But is this really true?
It is possible that there are deviations in the statistical results obtained at different roulette tables because of small physical defects in the wheel itself, mostly because of minor differences between the numbered pockets at the bottom of which the little white ball will rest. Of the few thousand wheels rotating continuously in all casinos covering our world, it is absolutely certain - and many winners for over a century have proved by taking advantage of such bias - that a certain proportion of they are not perfectly adjusted. What this means in clear is that on some wheels, some figures emerge more than they should statistically long term others, however, come out less than they should.
How such a state of fact it could affect the players using one or more of the following methods, or bet on the numbers the more "late" or most "hots" or those who go out more?
If you play consistently the highest figures behind a hundred different wheels, it is possible that one day you fall on one or more wheels to be biased, we still remember, wheels out some numbers and some statistically others less than what should be the case. Should such an occurrence, if ever you bet on most counts "Late" and that, unfortunately, some of them were among the issues that negatively biased roulette, you would be disadvantaged.
At the same table, a player with a strategic approach involving instead of always playing on the numbers that come out the most, would be more likely to choose, unlike the previous player, numbers that are positively biased and benefit to a greater degree that their technique should only provide it.
Summing up, we can say that:
All roulette bets are mathematically equivalent - with the exception of one, one that covers both the 0, 00, 1, 2 and 3 on the American roulette is a bet that no one should never do because it is the only one that is statistically less advantageous than all the others, a "sucker bet" involving a statistical advantage for the casino of 7.89% - we tend to believe that it is strictly identical to using techniques that exploit long absences or high recurrence of certain numbers. But is this really true?
It is possible that there are deviations in the statistical results obtained at different roulette tables because of small physical defects in the wheel itself, mostly because of minor differences between the numbered pockets at the bottom of which the little white ball will rest. Of the few thousand wheels rotating continuously in all casinos covering our world, it is absolutely certain - and many winners for over a century have proved by taking advantage of such bias - that a certain proportion of they are not perfectly adjusted. What this means in clear is that on some wheels, some figures emerge more than they should statistically long term others, however, come out less than they should.
How such a state of fact it could affect the players using one or more of the following methods, or bet on the numbers the more "late" or most "hots" or those who go out more?
If you play consistently the highest figures behind a hundred different wheels, it is possible that one day you fall on one or more wheels to be biased, we still remember, wheels out some numbers and some statistically others less than what should be the case. Should such an occurrence, if ever you bet on most counts "Late" and that, unfortunately, some of them were among the issues that negatively biased roulette, you would be disadvantaged.
At the same table, a player with a strategic approach involving instead of always playing on the numbers that come out the most, would be more likely to choose, unlike the previous player, numbers that are positively biased and benefit to a greater degree that their technique should only provide it.
Summing up, we can say that:
- on wheels statistically reliable and well balanced, which should be the case in the vast majority of instances, there will be no mathematical difference between playing on " sleepers", the numbers that sleep does not come out, and the numbers "hots" or those who leave more than the average of the other.
- on a wobbly wheel, a player who prefers in its approach to always play on numbers that are not long out risk, since he plays a fairly large number of different wheels - which increases the likelihood to fall on some biased - losing more than he should.
- on this same biased roulette, a player preference numbers that come out the most, will benefit.
So, in conclusion, to the extent that we play in real casino roulette with a physical, not an online casino with their electronic roulette, it is probably better, because of the possibility - more most minimal amount any more casinos act to prevent such situations may be disadvantageous for them - sometimes falling on wheels biased in favor of technical approaches using priority numbers that come out the most.
