Sunday, November 29, 2009

Engagement Invitation Sample

The weekly press reviews of economic and social sciences written by students in first and final

The weekly press reviews of economic and social sciences written by students in first and final which are posted weekly on the site known Directed http://savoirenscene.blogspot.com/



the press review of 23 to 27 November 2009 for students in first and terminal made by Emily and Mariette (BSE school seniors in class European English)



in the introduction: if the press there not a declaration of love written by journalists of the daily La Presse to save their newspapers in the bottom of "If you did not exist" as performed at the time by Joe Dassin .



the press release:



presseterminale review of 23 to 27 November 2009 and Mariette by emily
in Review Press 23 to 27 November for students in second and first performed David and Maxim students first ESA



Press Review of 23 to 27 November 2009 by David and Maxim

Monday, November 16, 2009

Nadine Jansen Dailymotion

the magazine's press 9 to 14 November 2009

The first press review: current economic and social life of 9 to 14 November 2009

The press review will be posted online each week for pupils in grades one ESA and TESA-TESB:
  • ESA students first write a review news commentary programs on second and first destination of students from these two levels
  • students TESA-TESB write a press review for pupils of first and ES Terminale ES

the magazine's press 9 to 14 November 2009

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Happy Birthday Wishes Boss

page tutorial net vibes

Tutorial Building your personal netvibes

javascript: void (0)
In the project blog in terminal knowledge stage and class project EMP (project media education) students are a personal netvibes allowing them to write a press review of SES weekly accessible to a student first (first draft) or terminal (draft terminal)



Introducing: a video presentation:


Please install Flash Player to play video


to download

used in the tutorial project blog:

ppt create a personal Netvibes page ;                                                                   

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Pokemon Heartgold Shiny Chaining

a vegetarian world to ensure sustainable development?

In echoes: Stern to become vegetarian fight against global warming



Eating meat Will it become socially unacceptable? Nicholas Stern, the author, in 2006, one of the most influential reports on climate change and authority on these matters, is not far from thinking. A bit like vis-à-vis the drunk drivers, our tolerance vis-à-vis those who are not geared towards a vegetarian diet will decrease in coming years, given the consequences for the planet livestock animals, explains Lord British in an interview with Times of London.

"Meat causes gaspi water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It exerts considerable pressure on the resources of the planet. A vegetarian diet is much better," says Stern.

methane in large quantities in the flatulence of cows and pigs, would have an impact on the greenhouse effect 23 times more potent than carbon



For English speakers: the site of the Times
and song Sunday:





Thursday, October 8, 2009

Prices Of Make Up Brushes

The presentation of the seminar Clemi: Using magzine regional voice The presentation is free


National Seminar Clemi "Media and economics



first-class operation in ES magazine France 3 Aquitaine voice is clear: the example of the milk market


presentation clemi milk market

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Small Bumps On Stomach And Bra Line

CLEMI of the seminar: prof blog to blog student


National Seminar CLEMI
Media and economy
October 7, 2009


The new youth media consumption: accompany

presentation clemi 7 octobre 2009                                                                                                                        

Monday, June 22, 2009

Paintball In Sanad Bahrain

What regulation out of the crisis?

On the website the life of ideas an interview with A Orlean on:


What regulation to end the crisis?


Analyzing the current crisis? What are the alternatives? For the economist Andre Orlean, the crisis is not the mere fact of the immorality of economic agents, and regulation of future markets will be reduced from the perspective of the G20, a mere increase transparency.

According

Andre Orlean, research director at CNRS and director of studies at EHESS, the regulation must focus not on the agents, but on market structures: we must think in terms of partitioning, rather than transparency. However, we must not minimize the subjective perceptions and beliefs in the understanding of economic processes, because the economy is also a matter of affect.

- Summary Videos


What is your diagnosis of the current crisis?

What is your diagnosis of the current crisis?
If this video does not work despite the presence of Flash or you can not install Flash (eg mobile) you can see directly on Dailymotion .


From this diagnosis, and to fight against this runaway, what are possible solutions?

From this diagnosis, and to fight against this runaway, what are the alternatives?
If this video does not work despite the presence of Flash or you can not install Flash (eg mobile) you can see directly on Dailymotion .


Is a control through the partitioning of the financial circuits means a form of protectionism?

Is a control through the partitioning of the financial circuits mean a form of protectionism?
If this video does not work despite the presence of Flash or you can not install Flash (eg mobile) you can see directly on Dailymotion .


There is much talk of a crisis of confidence ... What is the share parameter subjective in the current crisis?

There is much talk of a crisis of confidence ... What proportion of subjective parameters in the current crisis?
If this video does not work despite the presence of Flash or you can not install Flash (eg mobile) you can see directly on Dailymotion .


mechanisms of financial capitalism are becoming more abstract. Y happens when even an emotional dimension?

mechanisms of financial capitalism are becoming more abstract. Y he still an emotional dimension?
If this video does not work despite the presence of Flash or you can not install Flash (eg mobile) you can see directly on Dailymotion .


What are the institutional levers to overcome this distrust and fight cons crisis? And can we trust these regulatory institutions?

What are the institutional levers to overcome this distrust and fight against the crisis? And can we trust these regulatory institutions?

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

What Does The Summit Trainer Do

Investment rules applied to the game - Part

The following is inspired by an article published in English on the site Money Central. He recounts twenty golden rules of investment. I am freely inspired to show how most of these rules must be known, understood and diligently applied by anyone who aspires to the label of a professional player.

The game world is, different angles, much more risky than investment world traditional, even if only because of the speed at which it is possible to lose huge sums. We must therefore develop a global vision of the game world which will in many ways similar to the investment world, but located on a different plane with respect to aspects of risk and potential returns. If

invest in a traditional way has already its share of risks, try to make gains in the game all the time should be seen as an enterprise architect ultra-risky.

1 - Buy low and sell high

The secular principle of the investment could be applied in the following game: Play parts whose starting price is low (small tournaments cheap; specific parts of your favorite games, but on tables with bets as low as possible; small friendly games, etc..) and try to maximize as much as possible your little investment.

Sell high is the fact to retire at the right time when we, in a game of roulette, for example, raised 100% of earnings after an hour of play according to the standards the most progressive investment make a certain percentage of profit in a short period of time is nothing less than a small miracle. Many players often tend to want to "win over" when the casino by attempting, with tactics more risky, too overdrive gains already excellent, thus exposing them lose again.

Many players do not know to appreciate the true value of a gain of $ 25, $ 100, even $ 1,000 awarded in a casino. They will often lose again. Sometimes they even lose more bankroll original game in a few spins , trying, put in some very risky "to rebuild." That you may already have happened if you have already played in a real casino. If such a situation presents itself - lose it again gains and return to its point of departure in terms of bankroll - there is only only sensible solution to borrow. PUTTING THE BRAKES! At worst, start playing with small stakes identical to those we put in the early game, or at best, stop the session and delivered the next part later.

So to summarize, play parties for amounts that seem small and reasonable, and you know when you've cashed out a satisfactory gain. Know also when you remove a draw where you do not record any profit. It's certainly better than to retire with a loss.

2 - Do not run after the performance at any price

Little Engine That Could. Prefer safer techniques in terms of probability and pay less rather than more risky techniques.

Buy On The Dips

This fellow council invites you to try, whenever possible, purchase your favorite stock following a fall in the price of these (red circles on the graph above). Buy the dips implies that you have the patience to wait for these falls take place before putting your money at stake

Let's see how this concept could be applied to roulette or blackjack .

Assuming you're a seasoned roulette player build magnet, using a variety of gains on non-occurrences, that is to say about aspects of roulette being the least left over previous spins. You approach a table and, true to your usual, take a moment to read the scoreboard numbers to get an idea of what happened during the previous couple of shots. Having toured all aspects, you see that the third dozen is not out only once during the last fifteen spins. It is, somehow, a dip in the occurrence of numbers belonging to the dozen.

Bringing your eyes on the carpet, you see a player sitting at the table placing chips on the dozen $ 500. In his depressed air, you know he lost a good sum of money and, instinctively, you suspect it will probably last 4 or 5 tokens for $ 500 which remain on the dozen cursed. You approached him, you ask how long the third dozen is not extended. He replies with an air of feverish 19 times!

You let him play a few more minutes, the time to see him lose his few remaining chips and you are now facing a rare situation. The third dozen is not extended only once during the last 24 spins . This is a major dip. It is time for you to "buy this action." Even in tens of thousands of practice swings you made free in the comfort of your home, you have never seen such a long non-occurrence over a dozen. You decide to play it using a simple progression 1-1-2-3-4-6-9-etc. and hope to win on the spin following, if not on the other ... Your chances that the third dozen do so not in the few following shots is almost zero. Not impossible, but almost zero. This type of non-occurrence happens, once every few tens of thousands of spins .

On a somewhat similar, though not a great card counter , you can witness at a blackjack table , the occurrence of a very large number of small maps (A- 2-3-4-5-6) in a series of 5 or 6 hands (equivalent to more than 100 cards if the table is full, or more than two packages of the hoof that contains six). The occurrence of small cards, according to the probabilities own this game, good for the dealer . It may be that you ALSO HAVE seen him win several hands in the past from the many small maps. This means So also there are more big cards that will occur over the next few hands. It is at this moment, the time to bet more than that would have been 5 or 6 hands earlier.


3 - Let your winners run

In other words, let your profits and do not accumulate, despite everything, "hurry" to leave a game table or a particular part that takes place very well for you.

Getting to do this is a challenge in itself and looks like a dangerous escalation on the edge of a razor. It all matters that concern me about roulette, one on which my answers are fewer seats.

Any investor worth the name should use systems stop-loss (systems that are designed to automatically sell shares whose price would fall below a predetermined minimum price). Obviously it is better to withdraw from an action before it undergoes a fall. Everyone can understand that. At least intellectually, failing to apply knowledge in real life.

Knowing how far to let up its profits is an art in itself. Imagine an investor who still sell their shares when they reach a level of profit of 10%. In addition to potentially be losses with some of his other securities, it could never take advantage of those who, if he does not sell anytime soon, it could yield profits of 30%, 50% or more.

4 - Cut your losses before they become excessive

You can, for example, in a game, be prepared to accept a loss of value of X before retiring and cover, using your own techniques, a potential gain of 2X. This way, you're quicker to say "GAME OVER!" before your losses become too large and "let a chance" when it is on your side.

Example: You go to the casino with a bankroll session $ 100. Whatever game you're playing, you make the decision to interrupt the game every time you record a loss of 10% ($ 10) or that you record a gain of 20% ($ 20). It seems small, it will seem even "têteux" to some. Yet this type of approach where you try, somehow accumulate small gains of 10% to 20% per game, that I promote. I would rather see these little additions like so many potentially walk me to a gain of 100% or more. But I do not cling desperately to the goal of doubling my money. Any gain as little as 10% in less than 24 hours, according all standards of the investment classic, already huge in itself. Know you remember when you face the casino games.

5 - Do not get too attached to a running game

This may seem contradictory to number 3 but, in fact, like many aspects related to games of chance, particularly those whose chances are almost 50% (baccarat, blackjack , French roulette, craps , etc..), thus resembling the good old coin, whatever pleasure or the desire to continue playing that you may feel you should always remember that there is only one ultimate goal whatever arena: the retreat with a gain in your pocket.


6 - In general, think long term

How to think long term in a game? you tell me. In spreads (extending) your bankroll total over a series of games. Doyle Brunson said that a professional poker player rarely committed more than 1% or 2% of its total bankroll on any given part. This means, in other words, a bankroll can theoretically afford to play 50 to 100 parts. Fifty to one hundred parts, it begins to fit into a long term plan. If you have a bankroll of $ 500 total, so you can play poker games in which you will not risk more than $ 5 to $ 10 per time. Same roulette. There are casinos in Las Vegas or token minimum is 25 cents . It exists on the Internet or the minimum bet is 10 cents .

Anyway, even if playing such small amounts of money seem to be too little to some, it is still the preferred approach. If you are unable to register substantial gains in terms of percentages when you run the risk of small amounts, do not expect to do with bigger.

That your life does not depend on the casino and for paraphrsaer the legendary Warren Buffett, "never play at the casino unless you can not consider never be able to play over the next ten years."

Monday, January 19, 2009

Content.yieldmanager.edgesuite.net

Myths poker

Having played poker significantly over the last three years I have noticed that most of those playing this game a dim eye roulette and see it immediately as a game which is less possible to win at poker. Most of them, when I tell them about roulette mention that this game depends on chance. As if that was not the case of poker ...

All mention of the fact that when you play roulette, it "plays against the casino," while when playing poker, "plays against other players." It seems in their eyes, easier to win against nine opponents who want at any price, and by all means, take their tokens, as against only one, the casino, which shot after shot, plays Similarly predetermined. A bit like blackjack, the dealer must follow the letter of pre-established rules and rigid. Knowing that the highest qualities of the masters of poker is to know literally hide their game as much as possible by varying the way they play, to better fool the enemy, we can say that poker and roulette at the two ends of the spectrum of predictability. And at several levels.

If I am offered the opportunity to face an opponent in any game whatsoever and I have a choice between a player always acting the same way and another constantly varying his game, I will choose without hesitation the first.

If I said that to win X amount, I had to beat an opponent either alone or nine opponents (or worse: 16000), I also choose the first option.

If they offered me a game where I can withdraw at any time without offending and another person where, after winning, it is difficult to get up without upsetting his opponents and impossible to do in tournaments, I would choose again, the first option.

The fact that players think of poker face "other players" and not "casino" is, in turn, equally wrong. Whether you play in cash games or tournament, the casino edge to this game, unfortunately, is far more detrimental than what can be found at roulette and many other games available.

Most places where you can play poker rake take a 10% all the money ends up in the pots at cash games. Note well here it is not 10% of the amount you are willing to commit early in the game, but 10% of all the bets you place during the game.

If, within a few hours of play, you place bets totaling, for example, $ 3,000, you should have lost about $ 300. This does not manifest itself as precisely that during a game or two data but in the long term, this statistical disadvantage entered the heart of this game should make you lose 10% of everything you bet. Thus, the casinos, this game like all others, enrich at the expense of the vast majority of their customers.

At tournaments, the same principle is at work. Whether you're in a real casino or on PokerStars.com, a tournament costing you $ 10 actually cost you $ 11. A tournament will cost $ 100 total $ 110 or more.

As for the aspect of "chance" of the roulette game that is often pressure to speak my interlocutors poker enthusiasts, it is no less present in poker. Whether you're the greatest master of the bluff that is, it will always end up needing good cards if you want to do anything worthwhile when a poker game.

You have about as much chance to have a pair of 4 in your hands in a game of Texas Holdem than winning a bet riding on the wheel (a bet covering two numbers with one bet the overlap). What you get constantly good cards in a poker match will earn you proportionally as much as if your numbers come out during a game of roulette. The reverse is also true. Obtaining bad cards in large quantities correspond to the failure hitter his numbers in roulette.

A French roulette with the rule "in prison" has a edge of only 1.35%. Compared to 10% found common in poker, it seems pretty good.

Being familiar with the probabilities of the game of roulette, really "sense" occurrences and non-occurrences of events with varying probabilities for having played enough, may help some to be better at poker by knowing look, literally put Side-by-side, the odds of roulette and poker, to make better choices.

And if you look at it as a poker player, there will always be dozens of games kitchen or living room in which you will not need to lose 10% of all your bets.

Monday, January 5, 2009

Without Clothes Midnigth Hot

Monetary strategies at roulette

It is important when playing roulette or other games of chance, have a clear set of strategies scaffolded before undertaking any development whatsoever, before risking a single penny of your money earned the sweat of your brow.

We must first and foremost we have a comprehensive strategy dictating what our bankroll s maximum / minimum, our play time allotted maximum and minimum percentages of gain or loss that it's time we to withdraw from the game, etc..

It must also have a game plan to own one to which we engaged. For example, knowing the tips of his fingers all martingales and progressions roulette, know the card counting blackjack to , know how to calculate its odds poker, etc..

But we must also have a monetary strategy''clearly established''before playing a particular party. Means primarily the monetary strategy of putting all the rules that we follow based on the relative magnitude of our bankroll during the game.

One of the basic principles governing the management of their bankroll could be summarized as follows:

"The more bankroll is large relative to its original amount, the more we can afford to gradually increase his bets, the more we can take risks. Note here that I say "may" and not "we must" or "must". This is the only context in which, according to the techniques that I use, I can if I want to take a little more risk. Over the bankroll is small compared to the original amount, the more we must reduce its bets and be more careful. "

illustrate this with a simple example. Let's say Joe has a bankroll session - a session that can be composed of one or more parts - $ 500. Its basic unit is $ 5 per token (1% 500 $). If, during the game he achieved, for example, $ 700 in total, could now, if thought fit, playing with chips worth $ 7. If, instead, he went down to $ 300, it might consider using tokens $ 3 for the time necessary to try to recover at least $ 200 lost.

Doing so allows you to create an effect similar to compound interest when you're in a lucky wave and limit your losses if you are unlucky in a wave.

Maybe you've already had a science teacher made you a little mystified by saying that as you move an object from a wall half the distance that separates them, and as many times as you want, never the object will reach the wall. Imagine a ball located 1 m from a wall. Move closer to the wall than half that distance. 50 cm, 25 cm, 12.5 cm, etc.. Do this ten times and your ball will then be at 0.01 cm from the wall but do not touch.

A player who would fall all the time its made to match the value of a token 1% of his bankroll any losses should, theoretically, never completely exhausted. I say "theoretically" here because the casinos will not let you decrease your bets as to infinity. The minimum bet the casino is here to remember the boundaries within which you can play. The width of these borders is your greatest ally as a roulette player. We return to this subject in a future article.

"A wave, it brings you luck or bad luck
will always have an end."

In techniques that I favor, 1% of bankroll represents roughly , a base unit. This is both because only use I have come to the conclusion that it was the best option, neither too aggressive nor too passive, needed to win this game, besides being an element mathematical basis of ten who can perform simple mental calculations during the game. To try to maximize your winnings at the roulette table, you must walk the fine line that separates the side "too risky" side "too conservative".

If you are really an amateur venture, you can increase the value of your token based on a percentage of 2% or 3% per token. I do not recommend it. Beyond 1-2%, I consider that the element of chance take too much space in your gains or losses at the expense of implementing strategies that often require a little more patience and application, but which give more predictable results. Strategies in which incremental increases or reduces its risk level very gradually with the results we get are preferred.

If instead, you're more the type neophyte - the kind uncle Marcel playing roulette for the first time in his life - I suggest you use tokens whose unit value is more around 0, 5%, 0.33% or 0.25% of your bankroll session. If you had $ 250 bankroll you could use $ 1 coins for example (0.40% per token). This will stretch the length of your gaming session while decreasing the probability of large gains or large potential losses, but will also make you more likely to encounter a possible long wave unlucky.

Here are some basics that will help you determine what your strategy "investment".

Never bet more than 1% of your gross annual
Roughly speaking, this rule requires that you not playing more than 1% of your gross annual income during a given year. Roulette is a game which often produce earnings well above those obtainable in any other legal framework, it must be considered an investment with very, very high risk''in which we invest a''very, very small proportion of its overall portfolio.

conservative investors often shiver of excitement before the risk can offer some investments, often preferring to opt for the security of an investment yielding a small percentage of annual earnings, rather than risk more by having recourse to a potentially higher investment risky but potentially more profitable. I remind that an investment in higher risk requires logically put less money, corollary to the fact that this investment can potentially earn you a percentage much higher. If you lose your high-risk investment, you'll have lost a smaller amount than what you would put in a more traditional investment and potentially less profitable. If you

approximately $ 10,000 per year, you can not risk more than $ 100 per year. If you make $ 100,000 a year, you can not risk more than $ 1,000 per year. Etc..

We strongly recommend that annual amount divided into four or five sub-sums, enabling one can risk $ 1000 a year of playing, say, five parts of $ 200 or six parties whose bankrolls could be the successive : 75 $ $ 100, $ 125, $ 150, $ 200 and $ 350. There is no shadow of a doubt that it is easier for a novice player to face a few different game sessions with smaller amounts than attempting a big session with an amount representing his entire bankroll year. This is a concept somewhat similar to how an investor would spread the money from his portfolio on a series of investments rather than putting all your eggs in one basket.

non-taxable gains made at the casino have a value greater than any gain.
Some countries have casinos whose earnings are 100% tax excluded. This applies, among other casinos located in Quebec.

Suppose Joe has a job related to him $ 100,000 a year. He must pay 50% of its gross income to tax. Every dollar earned and therefore has a real value of 50 cents.

If Joe pulled the same income of $ 100,000 through various stock investments, it should pay 25% of its gross income to tax, because in Canada's capital gains are taxed at 50% . Every dollar earned and will have a value of 75 cents.

The same $ 100,000 won at the casino or the lottery would bring in exactly this: $ 100,000 net. Every dollar earned in this manner will have a value of $ 1.

This fact should motivate you to strive for gains of 50% of the amount you are targeting "really". For example, if a 50% gain in one session of play seems a purpose worth, divide by two. 25% gain in real terms equates to a gain of 37.50% makes the stock market or 50% depending on the value scale of dollars earned by working.

Please note again that this example applies to Quebec and not necessarily elsewhere. The tax rules and those on winnings from casinos vary enormously from one country to another. Please consult a person qualified to assist you in regard to anything concerning your finances, investments, etc.. to learn more about it.

The monetary aspect of your game must understand - a little to the instance of serious investors who act this way - a plan for what you will do if ever, after winning an amount you think is interesting, you put yourself then to lose it again. How much of your hard-earned win would you be ready to let go before you decide to withdraw or at least take a break so you do not lose it again probably all your winnings.

Say Martin arrived at the casino with $ 500 in his pocket. Before his arrival, he had already decided to play "both sides" to $ 250 each. This means that, whatever the type of technique that he planned to use, it would play a part for $ 250 with $ 2 chips (each unit representing 0.8% of its then to bankroll part) and that, should complete loss of that amount, he would play another party for $ 250, without actually increasing its level of risk, ie using chips from the same denomination, $ 2, and a technique similar to that used during the first part.

The question we bother with here is rather to know what would happen if, in his first game, Martin earned X amount of interest and began to lose it again.

After an hour of play, his winnings are $ 120. Compared to his bankroll part, this represents a gain of 48%. It is a very good result equivalent to 0.8% increase per minute.

Compared to the maximum amount that he's risking his bankroll or $ 64 (his bankroll are never dropped below $ 186) this is a magnificent 187% gain, equivalent to 3.12% gain per minute tax free to boot. This is a more than excellent result.

It is rare for Martin to do more than 3-4% per minute in the game of roulette using the techniques he prefers. 3-4% per minute literally represents the upper limit of what can be achieved by him. The hundreds of hours he spent practicing, constantly refine his techniques, have enabled him to see what is possible and what is not, what is more probable and what is less. He considers himself very lucky in the circumstances and try, whenever possible, to consolidate these gains, and not, as would amount to gamblers try to endless remultiplier this amount to the detriment of the most elementary prudence. As if this wave of opportunity would be infinite ... Morning

How should therefore accept the loss of $ 120 before leaving this part? $ 20? $ 40? $ 60? More? The answer to this question belongs to you fully. I will simply say that it is more depressing to lose it again 100% of its earnings, not lose it again correct that up to 50% and preferable to limit this loss to 25% less. This requires a lot of self control .

Always calculate gains or losses as a percentage per minute you can literally how you're doing during the game. Appreciate the value of a gain obtained and this will help you out in a timely manner.

Good practice!